gcc 5.2 vs gcc 8.1

Windows specific questions.
deltarho[1859]
Posts: 1574
Joined: Jan 02, 2017 0:34
Location: UK

Re: gcc 5.2 vs gcc 8.1

Postby deltarho[1859] » Oct 09, 2018 20:41

FORGET gcc 7.3

I have been hammering it today and got a few 'libbacktrace could not find executable to open' with 64-bit.

It is a gcc bug. It actually appeared in gcc 4.8.1 and got fixed in 4.8.2. It seems to be related to multi-core compilation. The worst thing is it doesn't seem possible to guess whether a compilation will be successful or not and, of course, they are the best bugs, aren't they? <laugh>

I have just had to buy 8.1 a box of chocalates otherwise it wan't going to work either. <smile>

Return to “Windows”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests