I have recently spent some time converting the IUP and CD headers + examples.

Download here [win32 only]

You will need the "iup2_6_Win32_mingw4_lib" and "cd5_0_Win32_mingw4_lib" .a files to compile the examples.

Hopefully everything should work.

Adding the error handler from the example, this is the output: Error: ------ Message: "Unexpected operator "!" found at position 1" Token: "!" Position: 1 Errc: 0 5! = 0 5* 5 = 25 press RETURN to end It looks like the library doesn't like "x!" as input, it works when you do "(x)!". edit: you also ha...

I have not seen that c++ syntax before, but after some quick research, I would have to agree with it, except for one thing: Type muFun1_t As Function cdecl(Byval As muFloat_t) As muFloat_t (Unless it says somewhere in the docs to use stdcall?) I had a callback problem just recently, and usin...

Why not just fill the file with 0's or something constant? That could speed things up.

Interesting. Try:

Is it necessary to set those things in the constructor? Why not just set them using a sub, on the next line? Or have a single constructor and pass a flag to indicate that you mean defRectBounds or defRectDimensions. Here, I will save you the effort: #Macro dimCall (_var,_type,_sub,_a1,_a2,_a3,_a...

He declared main for a reason...

Another way you could do it is to pass the pointer of the parent type to the subtypes.

This is very good. I didn't try the other versions because they seemed incomplete, but this version seems very complete. Now maybe I can try for something 3d in FB :)

Great work ;)

Well there was that artist who made those cool looking cars, seeking a programmer to help him with a racing game. I wonder what became of that project- it looked interesting.

Yep, sorry missed that bit :P I agree, if it's possible then it would be great if it told you more specifically about the error. Like I said, on one project I added "declare constructor()" to a type, then had to get off the computer. The next day I completely forgot that I did so and was running int...

In relation to the license, I disagree with the GPL for this project. I wouldn't use this if I wasn't allowed to keep my source closed for my own projects derived from this framework. I prefer something like ISC, MIT or BSD. edit: Just to be sure, by derived I mean a program which uses this framewor...

The problem is that you didn't actually define what widget.draw_() should actually be. Note: Search the asm file for "_ZN6WIDGET5DRAW_Eii@12", you find: ## .draw_(.x,.y) mov eax, dword ptr [ebp-24] push dword ptr [eax+4] mov eax, dword ptr [ebp-24] push dword ptr [eax] push dword ptr [ebp-24...

I think it is important to design the system with a set of apis in mind to begin with, as Oz has listed in his revision on the first post. I don't want Oz to get mad and call off the project, so I just want to try and calm everyone down: It doesn't matter what libs we use, the project, in my opinion...

Let me just get this straight, am I mistaken in thinking that IUP and wxwidgets use the native controls (and by native controls, I mean on windows they will use win32 api, on linux they use whatever linux uses)?

I am interested in this project.