this is not a solution because iup is closely related to gtk. if the program uses an advanced function of gtk. it will crash.

amazing. 39-40 fps. under linux with wine. with Sleep (1, 1).

test under linux 64 based on ubuntu. all examples work. great job.

yes. there must be a gtk3 lib that is integrated when linking. but I don't see which one. i'll see later if i have time. i tested some examples found in the forum about win9linux. it works if it's simple. i still think fltk would be a better choice. perfectly suited to freebasic to generate light pr...

this is the question I asked myself. what does iup have to do with gtk. to check I have uninstalled gtk2 and gtk3 and I got an error message when linking in connection with gtk-x11-2.0 and gdk-x11-2.0... FreeBASIC Compiler - Version 1.06.0 (03-06-2019), built for linux-x86_64 (64bit) Copyright (C) 2...

I used this post : https://www.freebasic.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=25266&p=227176&hilit=deb#p227176 I generated the package in a lxd container to avoid installing too many dependencies in the real system. I didn't modify anything in the original freebasic source code. I used freebasi...

it seems that installing gtk2 and gtk3 is a bad idea. some libraries conflict... for example the compilation of IUP_FB_EDITOR has been successful but the program does not run with an error message: Gtk-ERROR **: GTK+ 2.x symbols detected. Using GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3 in the same process is not supporte...

I generated the deb package of freebasic 1.06 downloadable here :

https://ufile.io/yqj45

SHA256SUM : fbc_1.06.0-1_amd64.deb
02857992c0c9b83aa4a1de18e10b7f3083ac3bf3bcb161f87752b8f89976b943

for those who might be interested....

Hello to all! I am writing a Linux version of the library. I do not know how much patience I have :) You can try what I have written now. Of course this is only part of the library. The link will be the archive in the archive source files. In the Remark file lists the currently available functions ...

FBWin32 fbc -gen gcc -Wc -O2 elapsed time is 16.23899118442773 seconds FBWin64 fbc -gen gcc -Wc -O2 elapsed time is 70.21292596682906 seconds weird. but with : FBWin32 fbc fbc -gen gcc -Wc -Ofast elapsed time is 10.25711750597179 seconds FBWin64 fbc fbc -gen gcc -Wc -Ofast elapsed time is 9.41111613...

FBWin32 fbc -gen gcc -Wc -O2 elapsed time is 50.85937545920933 seconds
FBWin64 fbc -gen gcc -Wc -O2 elapsed time is 39.82537974277511 seconds

No comments

@Coolman it is your choice which compiler version you want to use, in my experience, FBx64 executables are usually faster than FBx86, except for graphics I don't have a real world benchmark, so here's the nbody benchmark my times on Windows 10 x64 FBwin32 fbc -w all -asm intel -gen gas launched fou...

finally. I will use the 32 bit version of freebasic. it is windows 64 compatible and most programs are faster. that said. I will soon stop using windows for linux. I would see the difference ...

why not harmonize freebasic 32 and 64 so that it generates only C code with the default compilation enabled with the option -O2. it would be more logical. and it will optimize the c-generated code in both versions. You can use the gcc backend also for 32-bit freebasic by passing "-gen gcc"...

I will see. to return to freebasic. does anyone have a benchmark source code to concretely evaluate the speed of 32 and 64 bit programs: - loop - between file output - arithmetic calculation - sorting ... no graphic test since apparently the 32 bit version is more optimized ... I would do it but I d...